Wednesday, June 22, 2005

 

The Gipper about to wipe 'that smile' off Tommy Lasorda's face

Ryne Sandberg thinks that Tommy Lasorda should be named manager for the US team at next's Baseball World Classic and I think he might be serious :

4. Who should manage the United States in the World Baseball Classic next year?

My top four candidates on current major-league teams are Bobby Cox, Tony La Russa, Joe Torre and Frank Robinson. On the other hand, Tommy Lasorda is a guy that thrives in that kind of situation – representing the country and the game of baseball. He would be an excellent choice.

I've had Lasorda as a manager before in All-Star games, and he makes the game a lot of fun. He has great motivational stories and also brings a lot of humor to the clubhouse, which I think is important in an experience like the World Baseball Classic.


This is the same Tommy Lasorda who hasn't managed a pennant winner since Reagan was in the White House. He hasn't managed in the majors since 1996. Why not get Tim Wallach and Andre Dawson to play? They haven't been involved in a game that's counted since 1996 either (neither has Jason Kendall for that matter). Lasorda did manage the US to an Olympic Gold in 2000, but back then he was a spry 73 year old. Lasorda makes Jack McKeon seem young.



Sandberg proves that you can play baseball for 16 seasons still not have a clue about it.

Ryne Sandberg wrote :

3. Is Manny Ramirez a Hall of Famer?

I think the Boston Red Sox outfielder has taken advantage of Fenway Park. He's very comfortable there hitting balls off the Green Monster, and he's been very constant in what he contributes year in and year out with his run production.

At this point of his career, Ramirez reminds me of Jim Rice and Andre Dawson. Both of them hit over 400 home runs in their careers, but they're not in the Hall of Fame yet. Ramirez could have six or seven years left and wind up with 500-plus home runs. At that point, you could talk about Manny as a Hall of Famer. But not now.

Five hundred career home runs used to be the magic number to get into the Hall. Rafael Palmeiro and Sammy Sosa reached the 500-home plateau the past couple of seasons. They'll test whether 500 homers is still a first-ballot lock due to baseball's explosion of home runs from all different factors – first and foremost the steroid issue.


There are so many reasons why Sandberg's argument is ridiculous. First of all Ramirez hit 400 homerruns in 500 fewer games than Rice and 1,000 fewer than Dawson. Ramirez has never had an on base percentage lower than .377 in a full season, Dawson never topped that even in his monster 1987 season. Rice's best was .384, Ramirez's was .457. Ramirez has scored 100 runs in a season, four times in a career that spans 12 seasons. Rice only scored as many as 100 runs three times in 16 seasons and Dawson even when he was considered the best player in the NL only managed 90 and has only topped 100 runs twice.

Ramirez has similar career totals over a much shorter time and his batting average, slugging percentage, and on base percentage are much higher than Dawson's and Rice's even at their peaks. Even at his peaks Dawson isn't even the same class as Ramirez and Rice just barely comes close.

 
Hear No Evil



From today's 'Voice of the People' in the Chronicle Herald :

The June 18 syndicated editorial page cartoon is disappointing.

I'm not a Michael Jackson fan and know none of his music. Nonetheless, all of us should be concerned about the most notable absence of fair play in much of the media coverage of his protracted trial.

Worse still, this seems to continue, unabated, even after his acquittal...


He knows none of Michael Jackson's music? He and Marlee Matlin must be the only two people in the world who haven't heard 'Thriller'.

 
Is it just me or is it really fucking weird that this year's Stan Rogers Folk Festival is in bed with Exxon Mobil? They're the presenting sponsor this year.

Exxon has funded several organizations which have lobbied rather vigorously to deny the existence of Global Warming and to keep the US from signing the Kyoto Accord.

What political parties do they fund? Between 85-95 percent of their campaign donations go to Republican candidates.

It's worked out to their advantage. Exxon donated '$1.2 million to the Republican Party in 2000, second only to Enron,' in September of 2002 Exxon signed a $50 million contract to supply fuel to the US Military.

From Animal Welfare to Human Rights Violations to illegal dealings with Sudan, Exxon has done it all! They even became the only Fortune 500 company 'ever to rescind both a non-discrimination policy and domestic partner benefits.'


ExxonMobil's decision to rescind its non-discrimination policy came as the result of the merger between the two oil giants in late 1999. Prior to the merger, Mobil's equal employment opportunity policy included a provision prohibiting discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation. During merger talks, company executives decided to eliminate Mobil's non-discrimination policy rather than apply it to the newly formed corporation. Mobil's same-sex domestic partner benefits, praised by its CEO only a year before at the company's stockholder meeting, were also revoked. (Unionized ExxonMobil workers are still covered under a pre-existing non-discrimination clause under the terms of their former contract with Mobil.) ExxonMobil executives did this in spite of the fact that its chief competitors - Chevron, Sunoco, BP, and Texaco - all prohibit discrimination against gay, lesbian, and bisexual workers, and several of those competitors grant same-sex DP benefits as well."


It's not like Stan Rogers is Phil Ochs or Woody Guthrie, but it does seem a little odd that a Folk Festival is in bed with a hugely conservative war profiteer like Exxon Mobil that is responsible for the world's most devastating oil spill.

  Powered by Blogger